After years of faithful service as a ratty F Street Prepared daily driver, my 2002 is being disassembled for a proper rework.
One of the big shortcomings of the car is the front suspension geometry, which was well designed, but well designed well before the advent of wide radial tires. Etc.
The first question is whether to try to correct the suspension while keeping the stock subframe, in hopes of landing in Street Modified, which has good attendance here in Portland. I believe this class would still allow me to do whatever I want with steering, control arms and struts, as long as the pickup points don't move, and I don't hack up the subframe (which is a big conditional).
However, I'd have a much freer hand for geometry, and it'd make swapping to a rack & pinion much easier, never mind the M42/M44 swap, if I ditched the stock subframe completely.
That, in turn, opens the can of worms of whether to stick with a strut front end or try to package double-A-arms (which likely means doing unpleasant things to the inner fenders).
The biggest potential plus of the latter is that it might be doable to basically borrow Miata geometry (and arms!), saving myself a lot of time with an Allan Staniforth-style string computer, and/or a lot of money on a copy of WinGeo3...
Further cans of worms are opened by each of these thoughts, but this is already too long.
Thoughts? Opinions? Observations that I've badly misinterpreted the SCCA rulebook? I've obviously got more research to do, as I don't even know whether the subframe would put me in XP or some Mod class...